Ex Parte Ahmed Zohair

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 2022
Docket04-20-00333-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Ahmed Zohair (Ex Parte Ahmed Zohair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Ahmed Zohair, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 16, 2022

No. 04-20-00333-CR

EX PARTE AHMED ZOHAIR

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR2128A-W1 Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

ORDER This is an appeal of the trial court’s ruling on a pre-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See

Arreola v. State, 207 S.W.3d 387, 390 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2 provides that in a criminal appeal where the

defendant is the appellant, “[t]he trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant’s right of

appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order….” TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). “An order denying a pretrial application seeking habeas corpus relief is an appealable

order.” Ex parte Stevens, No. 03-19-00103-CR, 2019 WL 1123457, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin

Mar. 11, 2019, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Schmidt, 109 S.W.3d 480, 481 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003));

accord Arreola, 207 S.W.3d at 390. Rule 25.2 further provides, “If the defendant is the

appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal

under Rule 25.2(a)(2),” and cautions that “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that

shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these

rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d). But the Rules of Appellate Procedure also provide for this court to order

the trial court to supplement the record with the certification of a defendant’s right to appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). FILE COPY

Ahmed’s habeas appeal is currently submitted to this court for consideration, but the Rule

25.2 form contained in the record does not belong to the trial court’s denial of Ahmed’s

application for writ of habeas corpus. Rather, it belongs to Ahmed’s plea proceeding. The

record contains no other Rule 25.2 form. Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2.

We therefore abate this appeal and order the trial court to submit a supplemental clerk’s

record that contains a Rule 25.2 certification of Appellant Ahmed’s right to appeal by May 31,

2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2, 34.5(c)(2).

It is so ORDERED on May 16, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Schmidt
109 S.W.3d 480 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Arreola v. State
207 S.W.3d 387 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Cortez, Damien Hernandez
420 S.W.3d 803 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Ahmed Zohair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-ahmed-zohair-texapp-2022.