Ewing Construction Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Insuranc

744 F.3d 917, 2014 WL 757188, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3688
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2014·No. 11-40512·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Consistent with the January 17, 2014 Texas Supreme Court opinion and response 1 to our certified question, 2 we VACATE the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant, Amerisure Insurance Co. (Amerisure), on grounds that coverage was excluded under *918 its contractual liability exclusion. We REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings, reserving to the parties any claims, defenses, and arguments other than those related to the contractual liability exclusion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

1

. Ewing Const. Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 12-0661, 420 S.W.3d 30, 57 Tex. Sup.Ct. J. 195 (Tex. Jan. 17, 2014).

2

. Ewing Construction Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 690 F.3d 628, 633 (5th Cir.2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ewing Construction Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Insuranc, 744 F.3d 917, 2014 WL 757188, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3688 (5th Cir. 2014).

744 F.3d 917 (Ewing Construction Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Insuranc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doug Crownover v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co
757 F.3d 200 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)