Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group
927 A.2d 205
This text of 927 A.2d 205 (Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group, 927 A.2d 205 (Pa. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of June 2007, the Petition for Leave to File an Addendum to the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The issues as stated by Petitioners are:
(1) Whether the lower court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment, where the decedent was a “class one” insured for the purpose of stacking underinsured motorist benefits under the policy of insurance issued in the name of the corporation.
(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in holding that underinsured motorist [206]*206benefits can not be stacked under a commercial fleet policy, which is inconsistent with and contrary to the [MVFRL] (75 Pa.C.S. § 1738).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 1738
Pennsylvania § 1738
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
927 A.2d 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everhart-v-pma-insurance-group-pa-2007.