Everette v. State
586 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976, 1991 WL 199933
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Everette v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7193 →
Opinion
The state having conceded error on these points, appellant’s conviction for grand theft is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court to correct the sentencing orders to delete the sentence for grand theft,1 to strike the special conditions of probation not orally pronounced at the sentencing,2 and to modify the condition that appellant “work diligently at a lawful occupation ...” to read “actively seek gainful employment_”3 In all other respects, the convictions and sentencing orders are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Everette v. State, 586 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976, 1991 WL 199933 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
586 So. 2d 511 (Everette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stallworth v. State
538 So. 2d 1296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cowan v. State
527 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Timmons v. State
453 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Rowland v. State
548 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)