Everette v. State

586 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976, 1991 WL 199933
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3685
StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 511 (Everette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everette v. State, 586 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976, 1991 WL 199933 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state having conceded error on these points, appellant’s conviction for grand theft is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court to correct the sentencing orders to delete the sentence for grand theft,1 to strike the special conditions of probation not orally pronounced at the sentencing,2 and to modify the condition that appellant “work diligently at a lawful occupation ...” to read “actively seek gainful employment_”3 In all other respects, the convictions and sentencing orders are AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stallworth v. State
538 So. 2d 1296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cowan v. State
527 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Timmons v. State
453 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Rowland v. State
548 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 So. 2d 511, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13976, 1991 WL 199933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everette-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.