Cowan v. State
This text of 527 So. 2d 305 (Cowan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Randall COWAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradford L. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
BARFIELD, Judge.
This case is remanded to the trial court for modification of the condition of probation requiring appellant, "if not employed within 60 days of release from prison to enroll in and complete Restitution Center" to read: "actively seek gainful employment upon release from prison." Unless the State stipulates that appellant's offenses did not cause damage or loss to the victim, the trial court shall also determine the amount of restitution which appellant will be required to pay as a condition of his probation, in accordance with the requirements *306 of Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1977).
THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 So. 2d 305, 1988 WL 65197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.