Everett v. State

595 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3304, 1992 WL 57889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Everett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 579 So. 2d 394
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1992·No. No. 91-01428·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge departed upward from the recommended guidelines sentence in this case based on multiple violations of probation/community control. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court has held that multiple violations of probation are not valid reasons to depart from the guidelines but that “where there are multiple violations of probation, the sentence may be successively bumped to one higher cell for each violation.” Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992). Therefore, we reverse the sentences herein and remand for resentencing consistent with Williams. We reject appellant’s other point on appeal.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everett v. State, 595 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3304, 1992 WL 57889 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 584 (Everett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
594 So. 2d 273 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)