Everett v. State
555 So. 2d 1330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 658, 1990 WL 8601
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Everett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 535 So. 2d 667 →
Opinion
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
We agree that the trial court erred in admitting testimony by a police officer that appellant had stated to him more than two (2) years before the incident in question that he had once possessed a shotgun belonging to his grandfather. There was no showing that this evidence was relevant to the charge being tried. See Huhn v. State, 511 So.2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Everett v. State, 555 So. 2d 1330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 658, 1990 WL 8601 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
555 So. 2d 1330 (Everett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huhn v. State
511 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)