Everett v. Everett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Everett v. Everett

203 A.D.2d 981, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 981 (Everett v. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everett v. Everett, 203 A.D.2d 981, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s child support obligation was properly calculated in accordance with the Child Support Standards Act (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b]). The record supports the Hearing Officer’s determination that the best interests of the children would be served by awarding custody to plaintiff and granting specified visitation to defendant (see, Carr v Carr, 187 AD2d 408, 409).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Queens County, Turret, J.H.O. — Divorce.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s child support obligation was properly calculated in accordance with the Child Support Standards Act (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b]). The record supports the Hearing Officer’s determination that the best interests of the children would be served by awarding custody to plaintiff and granting specified visitation to defendant (see, Carr v Carr, 187 AD2d 408, 409).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Queens County, Turret, J.H.O. — Divorce.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 981, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-everett-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack