Evelyn Goldsmith Home for Crippled Children, Inc. v. Island Park Associates, Inc.

227 A.D. 668

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think that a reply may be compelled to a plea in bar of a former judgment. (Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Corn Exch. Bank, 73 Hun, 78, 80; Olsen v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 138 App. Div. 407; Weglein v. Trow Directory, P. & B. Co., 152 id. 705, 709; Toplitz v. Garrigues, 71 id. 37, 39; Timble v. Russell, 41 Misc. 577, 579; Brinkerhoff v. Brinkerhoff, 8 Abb. N. C. 207.) But in view of defendants’ long delay in making the motion, we think that the learned Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying it. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evelyn Goldsmith Home for Crippled Children, Inc. v. Island Park Associates, Inc., 227 A.D. 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 668 (Evelyn Goldsmith Home for Crippled Children, Inc. v. Island Park Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klein v. Burleson
138 A.D. 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Timble v. Russell
41 Misc. 577 (New York Supreme Court, 1903)
Brinkerhoff v. Brinkerhoff
8 Abb. N. Cas. 207 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)