Brinkerhoff v. Brinkerhoff

8 Abb. N. Cas. 207
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

The motion that the plaintiff reply to the new matter contained in the answer in reference to the alleged decree of divorce in Connecticut is granted, with $10 costs to abide the event.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brinkerhoff v. Brinkerhoff, 8 Abb. N. Cas. 207 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

8 Abb. N. Cas. 207 (Brinkerhoff v. Brinkerhoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evelyn Goldsmith Home for Crippled Children, Inc. v. Island Park Associates, Inc.
227 A.D. 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Timble v. Russell
41 Misc. 577 (New York Supreme Court, 1903)
N. Y., Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Robinson
25 Abb. N. Cas. 116 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)