Evarts v. Jones
228 F.2d 105
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1955·No. No. 14761·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This case is here on a judgment of dismissal of appellants’ complaint for want of jurisdiction.
The complaint shows affirmatively that all parties, both plaintiff and defendant, are citizens and residents of the State of California. The suit has to do only with a controversy arising out of the construction of a conditional sales contract, presenting no federal question.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evarts v. Jones, 228 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1955).
228 F.2d 105 (Evarts v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates
228 F.2d 105 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)