Evarts v. Jones
228 F.2d 105
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1955
DocketNo. 14761
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 228 F.2d 105 (Evarts v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Evarts v. Jones, 228 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1955).
Opinion
This case is here on a judgment of dismissal of appellants’ complaint for want of jurisdiction.
The complaint shows affirmatively that all parties, both plaintiff and defendant, are citizens and residents of the State of California. The suit has to do only with a controversy arising out of the construction of a conditional sales contract, presenting no federal question.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates
228 F.2d 105 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 F.2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evarts-v-jones-ca9-1955.