Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates
This text of 228 F.2d 105 (Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eugene F. EVARTS, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts, Appellants,
v.
C. J. JONES, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones &
Associates, et al., Appellees.
No. 14761.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 9, 1955.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1956.
Elon G. Galusha, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Clock, Waestman & Clock, Long Beach, Cal., for appellees.
Before HEALY, BONE, and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case is here on a judgment of dismissal of appellants' complaint for want of jurisdiction.
The complaint shows affirmatively that all parties, both plaintiff and defendant, are citizens and residents of the State of California. The suit has to do only with a controversy arising out of the construction of a conditional sales contract, presenting no federal question.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 F.2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-f-evarts-monrova-s-evarts-and-eugene-k-evar-ca9-1956.