Evans v. Town of Edgefield

129 S.E. 207, 132 S.C. 380, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 233
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 13, 1925
Docket11819
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 129 S.E. 207 (Evans v. Town of Edgefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Town of Edgefield, 129 S.E. 207, 132 S.C. 380, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 233 (S.C. 1925).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This action was commenced on October 28, 1924, by the service of a summons and complaint on the respondent by the appellant, in response to a notice served-on her by the respondent condemning her land in the Town of Edgefield for a right of way for a public street.

Application for an injunction and a restraining order was made before Hon. 'J. W. DeVore at his chambers, who issued an order restraining and enjoining the respondent, and requiring it to show cause, if any it could, why the same should not be made permanent, returnable before the presiding Judge at Lexington, S. C., November 10, 1924. At the hearing at Lexington there appeared a Special Judge to hold the Court for that County, and his commission from the Governor stated, with powers for that County only. Appellant objected to the jurisdic *386 tion of the Court; the Special Judge held that he had jurisdiction, and heard the case. He held the return sufficient, dissolved the injunction, and dismissed the summons and complaint, although- the venue was for Edgefield County. No answer has been made to the summons and complaint, the case had not been docketed in Edgefield County or Lexington County, the Special Judge, therefore, was without jurisdiction to hear the matter.

Notice of appeal to this Court was duly served upon the respondent, and has been filed with the Clerk of this Court.

Exceptions 3 and 4 must be sustained under the authorities of Dallas et al. v. Inman et al., 107 S. C., 402; 93 S. E., 8; and Kinder v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corporation et al., 107 S. C., 404; 93 S. E., 7, and the order appealed from is reversed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran and Marion, and Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy concur. Mr. Ci-iiEF Justice Gary disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Builders Transport, Inc.
498 S.E.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1998)
Cooke v. State Highway Department
155 S.E. 228 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 207, 132 S.C. 380, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-town-of-edgefield-sc-1925.