Evans v. State

89 S.W. 974, 48 Tex. Crim. 589, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 291
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 1, 1905
DocketNo. 3290.
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.W. 974 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. State, 89 S.W. 974, 48 Tex. Crim. 589, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 291 (Tex. 1905).

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for destroying the life of a child during parturition, his punishment being fixed at five years confinement in the penitentiary. We do not deem it necessary to review but one question. In our opinion, the evidence is wholly insufficient to support the conviction. It fails to show with any degree of satisfaction or conclusiveness that the child was born alive, or was alive at the inception of its birth. Without such proof, the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction. The evidence being insufficient, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Davidson, Presiding Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.W. 974, 48 Tex. Crim. 589, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-texcrimapp-1905.