Evans v. State

80 S.W. 1017, 46 Tex. Crim. 476, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 157
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 4, 1904·No. No. 2698.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and Ms punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years. The only question we deem necessary to pass upon is the absence of the district judge from the bench during the trial of the case. The *477 facts presenting this matter are, in substance, the same as in Bateson 'v. State, from Johnson .County, decided at the Dallas term, 1904. While in some respects it differs from the facts therein detailed, it is not of sufficient importance to rehearse here. We held in that case that the absence of the judge from the courtroom during the progress of the trial constituted reversible error. For the reason therein assigned, the judgment here is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. State, 80 S.W. 1017, 46 Tex. Crim. 476, 1904 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 157 (Tex. 1904).

80 S.W. 1017 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. State
149 S.W. 173 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
French v. State
117 S.W. 848 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)