Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1125V
RITA EVANS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: January 16, 2026 v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Catherine Wallace Costigan, Mctlaw, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Parisa Tabassian, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1
On August 29, 2022, Rita Evans filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration following an influenza vaccine she received on October 1, 2020. Petition, ECF No. 1. On July 7, 2025, I issued a decision finding Petitioner entitled to compensation and awarding damages, following briefing and expedited Motions Day argument by the parties. ECF No. 43.
1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $75,233.82 (representing $74,128.00 in fees plus $1,105.82 in costs). Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed July 17, 2025, ECF No. 49. Furthermore, counsel for Petitioner represents that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by Petitioner. ECF No. 49-2 at 1.
Respondent reacted to the motion on July 29, 2025, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondent’s Response to Motion at 2-3, 3 n.2, ECF No. 50. Also, on July 29, 2025, Petitioner filed a reply requesting that the amount of fees and costs listed in Petitioner’s motion be awarded. ECF No. 51.
I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. The rates requested for work performed through 2025 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and are hereby awarded herein.
Regarding the time billed, I note this case required additional briefing regarding entitlement and damages. See Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding Entitlement and Damages, filed March 27, 2024, ECF No. 33; Petitioner’s Reply to Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s memorandum, filed May 2, 2024, ECF No. 35; Petitioner’s counsel expended approximately 12.6 hours drafting the entitlement and damages brief and 12.5 hours drafting the responsive brief, for a combined total of 25.1 hours. ECF No. 49-5 at 27, 32- 33. I find this time to have been reasonably incurred.
Petitioner has otherwise provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. ECF No. 49-6 at 1-52. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT, Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $75,233.82 (representing $74,128.00 in fees plus $1,105.82 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix
2 B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review. 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.