Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 23, 2024·No. 21-0168V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-168V

SHEILA EVANS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 23, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On January 6, 2021, Sheila Evans filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner subsequently filed an amended petition on March 1, 2022. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting the administration of the influenza (“flu”) vaccination received on October 25, 2018. Amended Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at January 11, 2024, ¶¶ 1-2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, her symptoms lasted longer than six months, and she has not filed a civil action or received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Amended Petition at 2, 12; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on January 11, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS omcE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

SHEJLA EVANS,

Petitioner, No. 21-168V v. Chief Special Master Corcoran SPU SECRETARY OF HEALTH ANO HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Shella Evans (''petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injwy Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l Oto 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for an injury allegedly related to petitioners receipt

of an influema ("flu") vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Tabloj, 42

C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. On October 25, 2018, petitioner received a flu vaccine.

3. The vaccine was administered in the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time-period set forth in the Table. She funher alleges that

she experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months. S. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement ora civil

action for damages as a result of her alleged condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a shoulder injury as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any I ofS other injury~ and denies that her current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injmy.

7. Maintaining their above.stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that

the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has flied an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

vaccine compensation payment: a lump sum of$75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to

petidoner. This amount represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-lS(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l) and an application, tho parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incmred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1S(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation, and any amount

awarded pursuant to paragyaph 9, will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1 S(i),

subject to the avaiiaoiiity of sufficient statutory funds.

12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Evans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-1S
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1S(g)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 300aa-l0
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l0
§ 300aa-lS
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-lS(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a