EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
This text of EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CARL EVANS, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 24-1360 : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : SECURITY, et al., :
ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of May 2024, upon consideration of plaintiff Carl Evans’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (DI 1), and pro se Complaint (DI 2) it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (DI 1) is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2. The Complaint is DEEMED filed. 3. The Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons in the Court’s Memorandum as follows: a. Mr. Evans’s Fourth Amendment claims asserted under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and b. Mr. Evans’s claims for injunctive relief asserted under the Federal Torts Claim Act are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
___________________________ MURPHY, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-commissioner-of-social-security-paed-2024.