Evans v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJuly 8, 2020
Docket4:18-cv-02614
StatusUnknown

This text of Evans v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (Evans v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

Case MDL No. 2734 Document 315 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL? 68 J. pyusianoyvts, Chari □□ on □ MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, doves oy

IN RE: ABILIFY (ARIPIPRAZOLE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No, 2734

FILED (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) Jul 08 2020 SUSAN Y. SOONG CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —31) CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT □□□□ NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIF: OAKLAND On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 20 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 232 F.Supp.3d 1342 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 69 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Florida. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Florida and assigned to Judge Rodgers. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of-opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued untii further order of the Panel. inasmuch 28 no objection is pending al this time, the stay is lifted. FOR THE PANEL: CLERK'S OFFICE oe □□

John W, Nichols. * Clerk of the Panel FLAD PN axed

Case MDL No. 2734 Document 315 Filed 07/01/20 Page 2 of 2

IN RE: ABILIFY (ARIPIPRAZOLE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2734

SCHEDULE CTO-31 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 1802584 Davis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al CAN 4 18-02588 Green et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al CAN 4 18--02614 Evans et al v, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al CAN 4 18-02620 Adeniran et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al CAN 4 18-05114 Booth et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al CAN 4 18-05118 Stone et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Abilify (Aripiprazole) Products Liability Litigation
232 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Evans v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-bristol-myers-squibb-company-cand-2020.