Evans

185 Ct. Cl. 794, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 175, 1968 WL 2213
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedOctober 4, 1968
DocketNo. 111-68
StatusPublished

This text of 185 Ct. Cl. 794 (Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans, 185 Ct. Cl. 794, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 175, 1968 WL 2213 (cc 1968).

Opinion

Unjust conviction and imprisonment claim. — Plaintiff seeks damages pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1495 and § 2513 as a person who has been unjustly convicted of an offense against the United States and imprisoned. Plaintiff alleges prosecution in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659, that following a plea of guilty he was sentenced to a term of from 60 days to 6 years, that after serving 25 months he brought suit to have the sentence set aside, and that the district court vacated the sentence, resentencing plaintiff to 1 year as required by law and thereby effecting his release since he had already served 25 months. Defendant moved to dismiss the petition on grounds that plaintiff failed to allege any of the facts required by 28 U.S.C. § 2513 or otherwise comply with said section, that the gravamen of his petition is not that he was unjustly convicted, but that he was illegally sentenced for a crime which he admitted committing, and that he failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Upon consideration of the motion, and on the basis of decisions of this court in Smith v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 242, 246 (1964) ; Weiss v. United States, 120 Ct. Cl. 1, 2-3, 91 F. Supp. 742, 743 (1950) ; and Cratty v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 260, 75 F. Supp. 1005 (1948), the court concluded that plaintiff’s petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted by this court, and on October 4, 1968, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and ordered plaintiff’s petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cratty v. United States
75 F. Supp. 1005 (Court of Claims, 1948)
Weiss v. United States
91 F. Supp. 742 (Court of Claims, 1950)
Smith v. United States
168 Ct. Cl. 242 (Court of Claims, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Ct. Cl. 794, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 175, 1968 WL 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-cc-1968.