Evanns v. Gunn
This text of 262 A.D. 865 (Evanns v. Gunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal [866]*866by defendants, as supervisor and members of the town board of the town of North Hempstead, from a judgment adjudging a resolution of the said board amending the zoning map of the town to be unreasonable, unconstitutional, void and ineffective. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ. [177 Misc. 85.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 865, 29 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evanns-v-gunn-nyappdiv-1941.