Eustache v. State

83 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 5864756, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18669
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 2011·No. No. 4D11-3636·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes, following appellant’s substantive violation of youthful offender probation, which he admitted, the court sentenced him to fifteen years in prison for robbery with a firearm. The sentence is within the statutory maximum for this offense, authorized by the youthful offender statute, and not illegal. See id. The court did not revoke appellant’s youth[785]*785ful offender status,1 so his reliance on Blacker v. State, 49 So.3d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), is misplaced.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eustache v. State, 83 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 5864756, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18669 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

83 So. 3d 784 (Eustache v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvin Jean v. State
145 So. 3d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Christian v. State
84 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)