Eustache v. State

83 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 5864756, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18669
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 2011
DocketNo. 4D11-3636
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 So. 3d 784 (Eustache v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eustache v. State, 83 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 5864756, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18669 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Pursuant to section 958.14, Florida Statutes, following appellant’s substantive violation of youthful offender probation, which he admitted, the court sentenced him to fifteen years in prison for robbery with a firearm. The sentence is within the statutory maximum for this offense, authorized by the youthful offender statute, and not illegal. See id. The court did not revoke appellant’s youth[785]*785ful offender status,1 so his reliance on Blacker v. State, 49 So.3d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), is misplaced.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvin Jean v. State
145 So. 3d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Christian v. State
84 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 So. 3d 784, 2011 WL 5864756, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eustache-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.