Alvin Jean v. State

145 So. 3d 900, 2014 WL 3928292, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12438
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 2014·No. 4D14-2205·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Alvin Jean’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We write to comment solely on appellant’s claim that his fifteen-year sentences are illegal having been imposed following revocation of his youthful offender probationary terms. Through several recent opinions, this court has rejected that challenge and explained its reasoning when concluding that comparable terms are legal. See Mosley v. State, 134 So.3d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So.3d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Eustache v. State, 83 So.3d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvin Jean v. State, 145 So. 3d 900, 2014 WL 3928292, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12438 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

145 So. 3d 900 (Alvin Jean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lachenauer v. State
117 So. 3d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Mosley v. State
134 So. 3d 1124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Eustache v. State
83 So. 3d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)