Alvin Jean v. State

145 So. 3d 900, 2014 WL 3928292, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12438
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 2014
Docket4D14-2205
StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 3d 900 (Alvin Jean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvin Jean v. State, 145 So. 3d 900, 2014 WL 3928292, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12438 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Alvin Jean’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We write to comment solely on appellant’s claim that his fifteen-year sentences are illegal having been imposed following revocation of his youthful offender probationary terms. Through several recent opinions, this court has rejected that challenge and explained its reasoning when concluding that comparable terms are legal. See Mosley v. State, 134 So.3d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So.3d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Eustache v. State, 83 So.3d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lachenauer v. State
117 So. 3d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Mosley v. State
134 So. 3d 1124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Eustache v. State
83 So. 3d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 3d 900, 2014 WL 3928292, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvin-jean-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.