Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Stigler
Opinion
Opinion by
On appeal to this court the judgment rendered in the lower court was affirmed. A supersedeas bond had been given staying the execution. A motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078. the motion is sustained.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court in favor of the First National Bank of Stigler in the sum of 81,172.55, with 10 per cent, interest from January 8,1915, for 822.25 costs taxed in the lower court, and all .costs in this court.
By tbe Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1916 OK 769 (Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Stigler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.