Johnson v. Henshaw
This text of 1921 OK 33 (Johnson v. Henshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 14, 1920, an opinion was rendered by this court in the above case in favor of the defendant in error (80 Okla. 58, 193 Pac. 998), bu tit did not expressly give judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond. Motion is now made by defendant in error for judgment against such sureties. Under chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, p. 606, as construed by this court in Long v. O. R. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, Wilcox v. Wooten, 60 Okla. 204, *101 159 Pac. 1118, and Rumley v. Sanders et al., 62 Okla. 284, 162 Pac. 949, judgment should have been rendered against the sureties on the supersedeas bond.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court in favor of defendant in error, Willie Hen-shaw, nee McIntosh, a minor, by Pleas Hen-shaw, her legal guardian, against C. J. Nunn and H. L. Wood, sureties on supersedeas bond herein for the sum of $850, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from October 19, 1917, and for costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1921 OK 33, 195 P. 486, 80 Okla. 100, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-henshaw-okla-1921.