Eugene M. Lonsdale, Sr. v. L.L. Smelser, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co. And Unknown Others

709 F.2d 910, 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6170, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26195
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1983
Docket83-1004
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 709 F.2d 910 (Eugene M. Lonsdale, Sr. v. L.L. Smelser, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co. And Unknown Others) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eugene M. Lonsdale, Sr. v. L.L. Smelser, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co. And Unknown Others, 709 F.2d 910, 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6170, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26195 (5th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that appellees’ Motion for Award of Double Costs and Attorneys’ Fees is granted.

In this Court’s order dismissing the appeal in this case, this Court noted that this *911 was appellant’s third appearance in federal court attacking well settled principles of this Nation’s income tax laws. Notably, in resolving an appeal brought by appellant in one of these earlier actions, this Court said:

Appellants’ contentions are stale ones, long settled against them. As such they are frivolous. Bending over backwards, in indulgence of appellants’ pro se status, we today forbear the sanctions of Rule 38, Fed.R.App.P. We publish this opinion as notice to future litigants that the continued advancing of these long-defunct arguments invites such sanctions, however.

Lonsdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 661 F.2d 71, 72 (5th Cir.1981).

Surprisingly, appellant ignored this Court’s admonition and brought the instant action relying on many of the same arguments rejected in Lonsdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 661 F.2d 71 (5th Cir.1981). Accordingly, this Court grants ap-pellees’ motion for award of double costs and attorneys’ fees. The motion being supported by an affidavit reflecting the time spent by counsel and the reasonable fee for such services, and these appearing to be reasonable and consonant with what is required in similar matters, we fix the attorneys’ fees at the sum of $1445.55.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

No. 90-2113
919 F.2d 1440 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
Lonsdale v. United States
919 F.2d 1440 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
Wise v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
624 F. Supp. 1124 (D. Montana, 1986)
McCullough v. Secretary of Treasury
621 F. Supp. 750 (N.D. Mississippi, 1985)
Pascoe v. Internal Revenue Service
580 F. Supp. 649 (E.D. Michigan, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 F.2d 910, 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6170, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eugene-m-lonsdale-sr-v-ll-smelser-the-atchison-topeka-and-santa-fe-ca5-1983.