Etheridge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Etheridge v. State

105 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 669

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1925

Docket2 Div. 331.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 923 (Etheridge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Etheridge v. State, 105 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 669 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence fails to connect defendants, or either of them, with possession of the stills found. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendants. Hobdy v. State (Ala. App.) 100 So. 571; 1 Biddle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563, 99 So. 59; Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App; 176, 95 So. 830; Farmer v. State, 19 Ala. App. 560, 99 So. 59; Medders v. State, 19 Ala. App. 628, 99 So. 776; Watts v. State, 19 Ala. App. 549, 98 So. 914. Reversed and remanded.

1

20 Ala. App. 44.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence fails to connect defendants, or either of them, with possession of the stills found. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendants. Hobdy v. State (Ala. App.) 100 So. 571; 1 Biddle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563, 99 So. 59; Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App; 176, 95 So. 830; Farmer v. State, 19 Ala. App. 560, 99 So. 59; Medders v. State, 19 Ala. App. 628, 99 So. 776; Watts v. State, 19 Ala. App. 549, 98 So. 914. Reversed and remanded.

1

20 Ala. App. 44.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheridge-v-state-alactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack