Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Biddle v. State

Biddle v. State

99 So. 59, 19 Ala. App. 563, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 31
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 5, 1924
Docket7 Div. 911.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 99 So. 59 (Biddle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biddle v. State, 99 So. 59, 19 Ala. App. 563, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 31 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

[1, 2] It is not a violation of the law for a man to be present at a still when whisky is being made. This was all the testimony for the state tended to show. If a defendant is present at a still located oñ his own premises or premises under his control, a different question would be presented. The "affirmative charge should have been given for the defendant as requested. Moon v. State, ante, p. 176, 95 South. 830; Farmer v. State, ante, p. 560, 99 South. 59.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. State
272 So. 2d 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Dixon v. State
115 So. 2d 269 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
House v. State
61 So. 2d 457 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1952)
Hudson v. State
31 So. 2d 774 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Arrington v. State
133 So. 592 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)
Elmore v. State
109 So. 114 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Burnett v. State
107 So. 321 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Washington v. State
107 So. 34 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Etheridge v. State
105 So. 923 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Stanley v. State
102 So. 245 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Williamson v. State
102 So. 485 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 59, 19 Ala. App. 563, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biddle-v-state-alactapp-1924.