Etheridge v. Etheridge
99 S.E. 37, 149 Ga. 44, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 112
Opinion
1. This court will not control the discretion of the trial court in allowing temporary alimony, unless it has been flagrantly abused. Civil Code, § 2979.
2. That the court required the husband (the defendant) upon cross-examination to state, in answer to a question propounded by plaintiff’s counsel, what he would take for a tract of land of which he was the owner, was not such error as will require the grant of a new trial; though the proper measure of the value was the true market value of the land in question. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Etheridge v. Etheridge, 99 S.E. 37, 149 Ga. 44, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 112 (Ga. 1919).
99 S.E. 37 (Etheridge v. Etheridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fitts v. Fitts
199 S.E.2d 256 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Walton v. Walton
135 S.E.2d 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad
124 S.E.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Johnson v. Johnson
62 S.E.2d 908 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Moss v. Moss
36 S.E.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Gaulding v. Gaulding
192 S.E. 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Luke v. Luke
115 S.E. 664 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)