Etechnologien, Inc. v. Roopa Arundathi Gadipudi

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 16, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1251. ETECHNOLOGIEN, INC. v. ROOPA ARUNDATHI GADIPUDI.

Etechnologien, Inc. filed this direct appeal seeking review of the trial court’s order granting Roopa Arundathi Gadipudi’s motion to set aside a consent judgment. An order granting a motion to set aside leaves the case pending in the court below and therefore is not a final judgment. Guy v. Roberson, 214 Ga. App. 391, 392 (1) (448 SE2d 60) (1994). Such non-final orders must be appealed by complying with the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Id. Etechnologien, Inc.’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/16/2017

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.