Etchieson v. Texas
This text of 378 U.S. 589 (Etchieson v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ETCHIESON
v.
TEXAS.
Supreme Court of United States.
Clyde W. Woody for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for consideration in light of Aguilar v. Texas, ante, p. 108.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Aguilar v. Texas.
*590
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 U.S. 589, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etchieson-v-texas-scotus-1964.