Estrada v. State
Opinions
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery by offering to sell a controlled substance, namely, cocaine, weighing by aggregate weight, including any adulterants or dilutants, at least 400 grams. He was sentenced by the court to twenty-five years imprisonment and assessed a fine of $10,000. The conviction was affirmed. Estrada v. State, 824 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1992).
[333]*333After careful review of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
846 S.W.2d 332 (Estrada v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.