Estell v. State
This text of 48 S.W.2d 256 (Estell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unlawfully possessing a forged instrument is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The indictment appears regular. The facts ¡heard before the trial court are not brought up for review; nor does the record reveal a sentence. In a felony case less than capital, a sentence is imperative to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. See article 772, C. C. P. 1925; Dorsey v. State, 114 Tex. Cr. R. 678, 27 S.W.(2d) 186; Williams v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 356, 269 S. W. 434.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.W.2d 256, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estell-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.