Dorsey v. State

27 S.W.2d 186, 114 Tex. Crim. 678, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 299
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 19, 1930
DocketNo. 13000.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 S.W.2d 186 (Dorsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey v. State, 27 S.W.2d 186, 114 Tex. Crim. 678, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 299 (Tex. 1930).

Opinions

Conviction for cattle theft; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

An examination of this record reveals the fact that same nowhere sets out any sentence. In the absence of a sentence this court is without jurisdiction. The sentence in a felony case is the final judgment in the cause, Arcia v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App. 193, and must be pronounced before an appeal can be prosecuted. Williams v. State, 99 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Ridge v. State, 96 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Stanford v. State,99 Tex. Crim. 394.

Because of the lack of a sentence the appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estell v. State
48 S.W.2d 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.W.2d 186, 114 Tex. Crim. 678, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.