Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad

2001 Ohio 17, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1248
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 2001
Docket2000-0839
StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 17 (Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad, 2001 Ohio 17, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1248 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1248.]

ESTATE OF LIPOSCHAK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CONRAD, ADMR., BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad, 2001-Ohio-17.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-839—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Jefferson County, No. 98-JE-26. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and Eric S. Bravo, for appellants. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad
740 N.E.2d 287 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2001 Ohio 17, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-liposchak-v-conrad-ohio-2001.