Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Jones v. City of Martinsburg
This text of 655 F. App'x 948 (Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Jones v. City of Martinsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Remanded by unpublished order. Judge Gregory directed entry of the order with the concurrence of Judge Duncan. Judge Voorhees wrote a dissent from the order of remand.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
[949]*949ORDER
In the unique circumstances presented, because the facts admitted as a result of the requests for admission, which formed the basis of the underlying motion to deem requests for admissions admitted, constructively resolved all of the material issues in dispute, giving the motion a dis-positive effect, and because this Court is unable to determine the extent of the district court’s rebanee on the admissions, this Court remands the matter to the district court for consideration of the discretionary factors in Rule 36(b) in determining whether to abow the withdrawal of the admissions. This order in no way opines on the merits of such consideration.
REMANDED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 F. App'x 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-jones-ex-rel-jones-v-city-of-martinsburg-ca4-2016.