Estate of Hicks v. Dana Corp.

909 A.2d 298
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 27, 2006·No. Appeal Nos. 24 & 25 EAP 2005·Published

Opinion

[299] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2006, it is hereby ordered that the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is affirmed as to the issue of the unconstitutionality of Act 57.

Appellants’ ancillary issues are transferred to the Superior Court. See Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 568 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386, 393 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Hicks v. Dana Corp., 909 A.2d 298 (Pa. 2006).

909 A.2d 298 (Estate of Hicks v. Dana Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrington v. Commonwealth
763 A.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
In re Condemnation by Commonwealth
798 A.2d 725 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)