Estate of Eisner
34 A. 577, 175 Pa. 143, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1225
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 13, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 210·Published·Cited by 17 cases
Opinion
The correctness of the decree from which this appeal was taken was amply vindicated by the learned auditing judge, whose opinion was adopted by the orphans’ court in banc. There is nothing in any of the questions involved that requires further elaboration. The decree is affirmed on the opinion referred to, and the appeal is dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Eisner, 34 A. 577, 175 Pa. 143, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1225 (Pa. 1896).
34 A. 577 (Estate of Eisner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cunningham Estate
149 A.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Rufe Estate
1 Pa. D. & C.2d 86 (Bucks County Orphans' Court, 1954)
Nirdlinger's Estate (No. 1)
193 A. 33 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Waterhouse's Estate
16 Pa. D. & C. 73 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1931)
In Re Joy's Estate
225 N.W. 878 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1929)
Nirdlinger's Estate
139 A. 200 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Dickinson's Estate
132 A. 352 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Gartenlaub v. Union Tr. Co. of S.F.
197 P. 90 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Veech's Estate
74 Pa. Super. 373 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Willcox's Estate
66 Pa. Super. 182 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Miller v. Payne
136 N.W. 811 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)
Lauman v. Foster
135 N.W. 14 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Day v. Faulks
81 A. 354 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1911)
Ballantine v. Young
79 N.J. Eq. 70 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1911)
Soehnlein v. Soehnlein
131 N.W. 739 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1911)
Mercer v. Buchanan
132 F. 501 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1904)