Estate of Anna R. Johnson

230 N.W.2d 236, 89 S.D. 149, 1975 S.D. LEXIS 129
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1975
DocketFile 11545
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 230 N.W.2d 236 (Estate of Anna R. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Anna R. Johnson, 230 N.W.2d 236, 89 S.D. 149, 1975 S.D. LEXIS 129 (S.D. 1975).

Opinion

DOYLE, Justice.

The decedent, Anna R. Johnson, died testate on January 9, 1971. In her will, after making several small bequests, she left the bulk of her estate to Marjorie L. Kulbel, an unrelated friend. The will was contested by certain heirs at law of the decedent with the result that a compromise agreement was reached whereby the estate was divided 50% to Marjorie L. Kulbel and 50% in equal shares to the nine contesting heirs at law. The South Dakota Department of Revenue contends, and its contention was sustained in the lower court, that the inheritance tax due the state be computed on the basis of, and in accordance with, the terms of the will of the decedent. On the other hand, the appellant contends the inheritance tax should be computed according to the compromise agreement which, in effect, distributed the estate. The method of computation urged by the appellant would result in a $4,883.35 reduction in inheritance tax assessed against the estate. *

SDCL 10-41-61 provides:

“All inheritance taxes imposed by this code shall take effect and accrue upon the death of the decedent, and shall be due and payable as soon as the amount thereof shall be determined as provided in this chapter.”

The authorities are in conflict on the question of the effect of an agreement compromising a will contest and providing for a distribution of the testator’s property other than as directed in the' will upon state inheritance taxes. The majority view appears to be that in this situation the inheritance tax is computable in accordance with the terms of the will, unaffected by the compromise agreement. In cases taking this position, the courts have reasoned that since a will cannot be changed by an independent agreement entered into after the testator’s death, *151 property passing under such an agreement is not, in fact, inherited; thus, such tax is applicable only to property which is inherited. Anno., 36 A.L.R.2d 918. See also, 42 Am.Jur.2d, Inheritance, Etc., Taxes, § 76, p. 283. A statement of similar import is found in 85 C.J.S. Taxation § 1143b, p. 896.

In view of the statute, we are of the opinion that the majority position, above stated, is well taken. Thus, the inheritance tax in this estate is properly levied in accordance with the terms of the last will and testament of the decedent, unaffected by the compromise agreement.

The decision of the district county court is affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
*

No disclaimer was filed under SDCL 43-4-30; consequently, we express no opinion on the effect, if any, such a disclaimer would have had on the inheritance tax liability had a disclaimer been filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Fred W. Zoss v. State
2001 SD 124 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2001)
Estate of Zoss v. South Dakota Department of Revenue
2001 SD 124 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 N.W.2d 236, 89 S.D. 149, 1975 S.D. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-anna-r-johnson-sd-1975.