Esseily v. Hochul

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, 24 CIVIL 2932 (LGS) -against- JUDGMENT KATHY HOCHUL, et al., Defendants. eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order of Dismissal dated May 1, 2024, the Complaint is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accord 615 (Bldg.) Co. LLC v. Smith, No. 24 Civ. 753, 2024 WL 1715257, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2024). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 2, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk