Esquivel v. Raney

California Court of Appeal

Esquivel v. Raney

234 P.2d 62, 106 Cal. App. 2d 162

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 17, 1951

DocketCiv. No. 18200

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 234 P.2d 62 (Esquivel v. Raney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esquivel v. Raney, 234 P.2d 62, 106 Cal. App. 2d 162 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

106 Cal.App.2d 162 (1951)

JESS ESQUIVEL et al., Appellants,
v.
DR. RUPERT B. RANEY, Respondent.

Civ. No. 18200.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.

Aug. 17, 1951.

Orloff & Pollack and Ruthe Jacobson for Appellants.

Ralph N. Highsmith and Henry E. Kappler for Respondent. *163

VALLEE, J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an order setting aside the entry of the default of defendant Rupert B. Raney. No judgment has been entered in the action.

[1] Section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure enumerates the various orders from which appeals may be taken. An order setting aside a default before judgment is entered is not one of the orders enumerated. It is therefore not appealable. (See cases cited in 5 West's Cal.Dig. (1951) Appeal and Error, 152, 113(3).)

Appeal dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

106 Cal.App.2d 162 (1951)

JESS ESQUIVEL et al., Appellants,
v.
DR. RUPERT B. RANEY, Respondent.

Civ. No. 18200.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.

Aug. 17, 1951.

Orloff & Pollack and Ruthe Jacobson for Appellants.

Ralph N. Highsmith and Henry E. Kappler for Respondent. *163

VALLEE, J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an order setting aside the entry of the default of defendant Rupert B. Raney. No judgment has been entered in the action.

[1] Section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure enumerates the various orders from which appeals may be taken. An order setting aside a default before judgment is entered is not one of the orders enumerated. It is therefore not appealable. (See cases cited in 5 West's Cal.Dig. (1951) Appeal and Error, 152, 113(3).)

Appeal dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 P.2d 62, 106 Cal. App. 2d 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esquivel-v-raney-calctapp-1951.

Opinion

JESS ESQUIVEL et al., Appellants, v. DR. RUPERT B. RANEY, Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

JESS ESQUIVEL et al., Appellants,
v.
DR. RUPERT B. RANEY, Respondent.