Esquivel v. Raney

234 P.2d 63, 106 Cal. App. 2d 162, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1725
California Court of Appeal·Decided August 17, 1951·No. Civ. No. 18200·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an order setting aside the entry of the default of defendant Rupert B. Raney. No judgment has been entered in the action.

Section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure enumerates the various orders from which appeals may be taken. An order setting aside a default before judgment is entered is not one of the orders enumerated. It is therefore not appeal-able. (See cases cited in 5 West’s Cal.Dig. (1951) Appeal and Error, 152, § 113(3).)

Appeal dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esquivel v. Raney, 234 P.2d 63, 106 Cal. App. 2d 162, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1725 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951).

234 P.2d 63 (Esquivel v. Raney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leo v. Dunlap
260 Cal. App. 2d 24 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
Davis v. Taliaferro
218 Cal. App. 2d 120 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Esquivel v. Raney
234 P.2d 62 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)