Espinosa v. State

99 So. 3d 522, 2011 WL 2586424, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10392
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 2011·No. No. 3D11-1013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Espinosa (“the defendant”) appeals from an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The trial court denied the motion on procedural grounds because of a pending appeal before this Court (case number 3D10-3415). Since then, the defendant has voluntarily dismissed his appeal in case number 3D10-3415. Accordingly, we reverse the order summarily denying the defendant’s motion, and remand for the trial court to address the merits of the defendant’s Rule 3.800 motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Espinosa v. State, 99 So. 3d 522, 2011 WL 2586424, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10392 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

99 So. 3d 522 (Espinosa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espinosa v. State
263 So. 3d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)