Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Espinosa v. State

Espinosa v. State

99 So. 3d 522, 2011 WL 2586424, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10392
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 2011
DocketNo. 3D11-1013
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 So. 3d 522 (Espinosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Espinosa v. State, 99 So. 3d 522, 2011 WL 2586424, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10392 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Espinosa (“the defendant”) appeals from an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The trial court denied the motion on procedural grounds because of a pending appeal before this Court (case number 3D10-3415). Since then, the defendant has voluntarily dismissed his appeal in case number 3D10-3415. Accordingly, we reverse the order summarily denying the defendant’s motion, and remand for the trial court to address the merits of the defendant’s Rule 3.800 motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Espinosa v. State
263 So. 3d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 3d 522, 2011 WL 2586424, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinosa-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.