Esfahani v. Esfahani

674 So. 2d 216, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5906, 1996 WL 294885
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Esfahani v. Esfahani. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7587
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 1996·No. Nos. 95-1651, 95-2557·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues in this appeal from a judgment of dissolution except we reverse the order awarding attorney’s fees to Mitchell Luber because there is no record support for 16.6 hours of services performed after he had withdrawn as counsel, and remand for a reduction of the award to him.

STONE, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esfahani v. Esfahani, 674 So. 2d 216, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5906, 1996 WL 294885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 216 (Esfahani v. Esfahani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.