Esfahani v. Esfahani

674 So. 2d 216, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5906, 1996 WL 294885
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 1996
DocketNos. 95-1651, 95-2557
StatusPublished

This text of 674 So. 2d 216 (Esfahani v. Esfahani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esfahani v. Esfahani, 674 So. 2d 216, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5906, 1996 WL 294885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues in this appeal from a judgment of dissolution except we reverse the order awarding attorney’s fees to Mitchell Luber because there is no record support for 16.6 hours of services performed after he had withdrawn as counsel, and remand for a reduction of the award to him.

STONE, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 216, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5906, 1996 WL 294885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esfahani-v-esfahani-fladistctapp-1996.