Escolle & Wife v. Merle

9 Cal. 94
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The appeal in this case is taken on questions of fact alone.

We are of opinion that the evidence introduced by the plaintiff was sufficient, if uncontradicted, to support the verdict; and we have uniformly held that we will not interfere with the verdict of a jury, when there is any evidence to support it.

The affidavit, and counter-affidavit, filed on motion for new trial, raised a question of fact as to whether the letters mentioned contained the admissions alleged by defendant and denied by plaintiff. This question was decided by the Judge below, and, we must presume, decided correctly.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent, damages, and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Escolle & Wife v. Merle, 9 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1858).

9 Cal. 94 (Escolle & Wife v. Merle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Reed
185 P. 515 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Frink v. Roe
11 P. 820 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Kunkel
17 Kan. 145 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1876)