Escolle & Wife v. Merle

9 Cal. 94
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 Cal. 94 (Escolle & Wife v. Merle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Escolle & Wife v. Merle, 9 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The appeal in this case is taken on questions of fact alone.

We are of opinion that the evidence introduced by the plaintiff was sufficient, if uncontradicted, to support the verdict; and we have uniformly held that we will not interfere with the verdict of a jury, when there is any evidence to support it.

The affidavit, and counter-affidavit, filed on motion for new trial, raised a question of fact as to whether the letters mentioned contained the admissions alleged by defendant and denied by plaintiff. This question was decided by the Judge below, and, we must presume, decided correctly.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent, damages, and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Reed
185 P. 515 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Frink v. Roe
11 P. 820 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Kunkel
17 Kan. 145 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cal. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escolle-wife-v-merle-cal-1858.