Escobar v. Irby

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedOctober 23, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-01740
StatusUnknown

This text of Escobar v. Irby (Escobar v. Irby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Escobar v. Irby, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Opinion

1 JL 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael D. Escobar, No. CV-23-01740-PHX-JAT (DMF) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Irene Barron Irby, et al., 13 Defendants.

14 15 I. Procedural History 16 On July 27, 2023, Plaintiff Michael D. Escobar, who is confined in a Maricopa 17 County Jail, filed a Complaint (Doc. 1-3 at 13-16)1 in the Superior Court of Maricopa 18 County, Arizona, against Irene Barron Irby, Sergeant Navarro, Officer Raymer, and Officer 19 Bernardino. On August 22, 2023, Defendants Irby, Navarro, and Bernardino filed a Notice 20 of Removal and removed the case to this Court.2 On August 28, 2023, Defendants filed a 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading/Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3). 22 II. Removal 23 A state court defendant may remove to federal court any civil action brought in the 24 state court over which the federal district courts would have original jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1441(a). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that Defendants violated 26

27 1 The citation refers to the document and page number generated by the Court’s 28 Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system. 2 Defendant Raymer was not served. 1 his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. This Court’s jurisdiction extends to such 2 claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a federal court has original jurisdiction “of all civil actions 3 arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”). The Notice of 4 Removal was filed within 30 days of Defendants Irby, Navarro, and Bernardino being 5 served, and the Removing Defendants indicate that all properly served Defendants consent 6 to the removal. It therefore appears this case was timely and properly removed. 7 III. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 8 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 9 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 10 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). After screening is complete, the Court will notify the parties if an 11 answer to the Complaint or any subsequently filed amended complaint is required. 12 The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised claims 13 that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 14 granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 15 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2). If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the 16 allegation of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint 17 before dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) 18 (en banc). 19 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4 requires in part that “[a]ll complaints . . . by 20 incarcerated persons must be signed and legibly written or typewritten on forms approved 21 by the Court and in accordance with the instructions provided with the forms.” Plaintiff’s 22 Complaint is not on the court-approved form. The Court may, in its discretion, forgo the 23 requirement that a plaintiff use a court-approved form. See LRCiv 3.4. The Court will 24 require use of the court-approved form because Plaintiff’s Complaint substantially differs 25 from the court-approved form. Thus, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed without 26 prejudice and with leave to amend, in order for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on a 27 court-approved form. 28 . . . . 1 IV. Leave to Amend 2 Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first amended complaint on a court-approved 3 form. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first 4 amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike 5 the amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 6 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 7 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 8 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 9 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 10 A first amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 11 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 12 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint 13 as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the 14 original Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice 15 is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 16 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 17 V. Warnings 18 A. Address Changes 19 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 20 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 21 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 22 action. 23 B. Possible Dismissal 24 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 25 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d 26 at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of 27 the Court). 28 . . . . ITIS ORDERED: 2 (1) ‘Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1-3 at 13-16) is dismissed for failure to file on a court-approved form. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first 4 amended complaint in compliance with this Order. 5 (2) — If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 6 | Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 8 (3) Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading/Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) is denied as moot. 10 (4) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a 11 | civil rights complaint by a prisoner. 12 Dated this 23rd day of October, 2023. 13 14 A 7 5 15 16 _ James A. Teil Org Senior United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4 provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Charlton D. Clay
16 F.3d 892 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Lopez v. Smith
203 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Escobar v. Irby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-v-irby-azd-2023.