Esaisa v. Superior Court
This text of 207 Cal. 796 (Esaisa v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter comes to us upon a petition for a writ of review to determine the legality of the findings and judgment and other proceedings leading up to the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, which matter has been .determined by the [797]*797defendant Superior Court contrary to the contentions of petitioner. The questions raised have all been disposed of in a case from the county of Napa, California, involving precisely the same legal situation, which case has been this day decided by this court. (Wheatley v. Superior Court et al. [S. F. No. 13281 of the records of this court], ante, p. 722 [279 Pac. 989].)
For the reasons stated in the case last cited, the proceedings are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 Cal. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esaisa-v-superior-court-cal-1929.