Erwin v. Smaller

2 Sandf. 340
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided February 24, 1849·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court. Oakley, Ch. J.

The only point in the case is, whether a wife can be compelled to appear and be examined as a witness against her husband. We are clear that husband and wife cannot be witnesses either for or against each other, on grounds of public policy appertaining to the domestic relations. The objection does not arise from interest in the event of the suit; but from the interruption which the allowance of such a practice would produce in the domestic harmony of the parties, and in that confidence which ought to exist in the marriage relation. The justice was clearly right, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erwin v. Smaller, 2 Sandf. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1849).

2 Sandf. 340 (Erwin v. Smaller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zane v. Fink
18 W. Va. 693 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
Russ v. The Steamboat War Eagle
14 Iowa 363 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)
Breed v. Gove
41 N.H. 452 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Smith v. Boston & Maine Railroad
44 N.H. 325 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Macondray v. Wardle
26 Barb. 612 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Draper v. Henningsen
1 Bosw. 611 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1857)