Erwin Pearl, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.
This text of 468 N.E.2d 700 (Erwin Pearl, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 619). We would add only that plaintiff’s affidavit on its motion to reargue failed to establish the merit of its case (see Canter v Mulnick, 60 NY2d 689).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 N.E.2d 700, 62 N.Y.2d 1031, 479 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erwin-pearl-inc-v-burroughs-corp-ny-1984.